Can you read this?

No. It's childish gibberish and total waste of time.

Sandi Bowman

[Ankesh]

On the contrary.

I love such stuff. Illusions help us see the extent of our senses.

One awesome video about illusions:
http://www.ted.com/talks/beau_lotto_...ow_we_see.html

And of course, if you want to make practical use of it - just start a salesletter with the above gibberish text style. Instant attention winning trick. Should definitely improve your response rates.

Ankesh, have you really paid attention to all the bad spelling and grammar on the internet? It's beyond belief!

As a writer, I seek to avoid such gibberish so it does not influence my writing when I want it to be 'just so'. Those who use this sort of gibberish are creating a self-defeating reality if they wish to be thought of as intelligent and a brilliant communicator, IMHO.

Bad habits, such as the use of gibberish, are very difficult to break and will, eventually, embarrass the person at some point in their lives (usually at a critical point). I've hired and trained enough people to know that incorrect usage and spelling WILL come out at often inappropriate times (such as on resume's) despite careful intents not to allow it.

"Time, and how we use it, is all there really is to life." - Sandra Bowman. Use your time well and it will reward you handsomely.

Sandi Bowman

[Ankesh]

As far as I can tell - Fishman doesn't intend to praise bad spellings.
His post is about tricking your brain.

Writing in the way his post mentions actually takes more time. Because its not errors. Its a *deliberate* arrangement of alphabets.

It makes most people go "oh wow" - this shouldn't be possible. But it is.

You probably don't want to write an entire website / letter / presentation with such lingo. But it does very well to make a point about how our brains interpret the written word. And is a great gimmick to win attention.

[Dien Rice]

Originally Posted by Sandi Bowman

Ankesh, have you really paid attention to all the bad spelling and grammar on the internet? It's beyond belief!

As a writer, I seek to avoid such gibberish so it does not influence my writing when I want it to be 'just so'. Those who use this sort of gibberish are creating a self-defeating reality if they wish to be thought of as intelligent and a brilliant communicator, IMHO.

Bad habits, such as the use of gibberish, are very difficult to break and will, eventually, embarrass the person at some point in their lives (usually at a critical point). I've hired and trained enough people to know that incorrect usage and spelling WILL come out at often inappropriate times (such as on resume's) despite careful intents not to allow it.

"Time, and how we use it, is all there really is to life." - Sandra Bowman. Use your time well and it will reward you handsomely.

Hi Sandi,

I know what you're saying, though I certainly don't think what Fishman wrote is "gibberish". It's related to psychological research, and while what he posted was a bit of fun, it has potential practical applications. (I already mentioned a possible application to speed reading in another post. It also has practical applications regarding the design of fonts and spacing, to improve ease of reading.)

I've generally had a "knack" for spelling correctly, but we should also recognize that spelling is fluid - it's not constant - and that English language spelling changes over time.

Right now, some people cringe when they read "cu l8r" ("see you later") - but who knows, that "spelling" could be the way of the future!

I was just looking at the United States Constitution for examples of how spelling conventions change over time...

Here are some...

Article I, section 2:

"The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers..."

(Of course, we spell it "choose" nowadays, not "chuse." The words "chuse" and "chusing" are sprinkled throughout the U.S. Constitution.)

Article I, section 6:

"...or the Emoluments whereof shall have been encreased during such time..."

(Of course, we spell it as "increase" nowadays, not "encrease." Also, "emoluments" is not a commonly-used word any more.)

Article I, section 10:

"...and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Controul of the Congress."

(We spell it as "control" nowadays, not "controul.")

My point is that spelling is fluid... For example, if enough people start spelling it as "choose" rather than "chuse," then, over time, "choose" will eventually be considered to be the "correct" spelling.

Best wishes,

Dien

I hear you, Dien. My argument is that, if people want to be taken seriously in business or otherwise (for the most part) they'd best know how to put together a good sentence using commonly accepted (note commonly accepted) grammar and spelling.

These shortcuts are okay for your notes but really not suitable for general communication where clarity is the goal.

I'm not into language development but can appreciate where you're coming from.

Keep smilin'
Sandi Bowman

bookmarked and b back l8er, bro, :-)